Information on Appeals

Decision Information

Decision Content

APPEALS NOTED

FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

CC Havanos Corp. (Re), [2003] 2 F.C. 241 (T.D.), has been reversed on appeal (A-565-02, 2004 FCA 110). The reasons for judgment, handed down 17/3/04, will be published in the Federal Courts Reports.

Canada (Human Rights Commission) v. Canadian Airlines International Ltd., [2002] 1 F.C. 158 (T.D.), has been reversed on appeal (A-481-01, 2004 FCA 113). The reasons for judgment, handed down 18/3/04, will be published in the Federal Courts Reports.

Canada (Registrar, Indian Register) v. Sinclair, [2002] 3 F.C. 292 (T.D.), has been reversed on appeal (A‑39‑02, 2003 FCA 265). The reasons for judgment, handed down 11/6/03, will be published in the Federal Courts Reports.

H.J. Heinz Co. of Canada Ltd. v. Canada (Attorney General), [2003] 4 F.C. 3 (T.D.), has been affirmed on appeal (A‑161‑03, 2004 FCA 171). The reasons for judgment, handed down 30/4/04, will be published in the Federal Courts Reports.

Kligman v. M.N.R., [2003] 3 F.C. 569 (T.D.), has been reversed on appeal (A‑79‑03, 2004 FCA 152). The reasons for judgment, handed down 6/4/04, will be published in the Federal Courts Reports.

Medovarski v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2003] 4 F.C. 227 (T.D.), has been reversed on appeal (A-249-03, 2004 FCA 85). The reasons for judgment, handed down 3/3/04, will be published in the Federal Courts Reports.

Realsearch Inc. v. Valone Kone Brunette Ltd., [2003] 4 F.C. 1012 (T.D.), has been reversed on appeal (A‑260‑03, 2004 FCA 5). The reasons for judgment, handed down 9/1/04, will be published in the Federal Courts Reports.

Sunshine Village Corp. v. Canada (Parks), [2003] 4 F.C. 459 (T.D.), has been reversed on appeal (A‑245‑03, 2004 FCA 166). The reasons for judgment, handed down 27/4/04, will be published in the Federal Courts Reports.

SUPREME COURT OF CANADA

CCH Canadian Ltd. v. Law Society of Upper Canada, [2002] 4 F.C. 213 (C.A.), was reversed in part by a decision dated 4/3/04, and will be published in the Supreme Court Reports.

Canada v. Gifford, A-191-01, 2002 FCA 301, Rothstein J.A., judgment dated 12/3/02 (C.A.), was affirmed by a decision dated 4/3/04, and will be published in the Supreme Court Reports.

Applications for Leave to Appeal

AB Hassle v. Apotex Inc., A-563-03, 2003 FCA 409, Rothstein J.A., judgment dated 3/11/03 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 25/3/04.

Bajwa v. Canada, A-89-02, 2003 FCA 341, Linden J.A., judgment dated 14/10/03 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 8/4/04.

Benoit v. Canada, A‑47‑02, 2003 FCA 236, Nadon J.A., judgment dated 11/6/03 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 29/4/04.

Canada (Attorney General) v. Roch, A‑685‑01, 2003 FCA 356, Desjardins J.A., judgment dated 26/9/03 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 29/4/04.

Canada (Registrar, Indian Register) v. Sinclair, A‑39‑02, 2003 FCA 265, Desjardins J.A., judgment dated 11/6/03 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 22/4/04.

Champion International Corp. v. Sabina (The), A‑668‑02, 2003 FCA 366, Létourneau J.A., judgment dated 2/10/03 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 4/3/04.

Club Juridique v. M.N.R., A-83-02, 2003 FCA 414, Nadon J.A., judgment dated 4/11/03 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 1/4/04.

Dynamex Canada Inc. v. Mamona, A-241-02, 2003 FCA 248, Sharlow J.A., judgment dated 4/6/03 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 4/3/04.

Ferring Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), A-105-03, 2003 FCA 274, The Court, judgment dated 19/6/03 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 4/3/04.

Jeddore v. Canada, A‑709‑01, 2003 FCA 323, Sharlow J.A., judgment dated 28/8/03 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 29/4/04.

Kirkbi AG v. Ritvik Holdings Inc., A‑395‑02, 2003 FCA 297, Sexton J.A., judgment dated 14/7/03 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. granted, 29/4/04.

Massé v. M.N.R., A-649-00, 2003 FCA 351, Noël J.A., judgment dated 26/9/03 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 4/3/04.

McClelland v. Canada, A‑403‑02, 2003 FCA 483, Noël J.A., judgment dated 17/10/03 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 15/4/04.

Merck & Co. Inc. v. Apotex Inc., A-226-00, 2003 FCA 234, Sexton J.A., judgment dated 26/5/03 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 4/3/04.

Shergill v. Canada, A‑723‑02, 2003 FCA 468, Strayer J.A., judgment dated 4/12/03 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 13/5/04.

671905 Alberta Inc. v. Q’Max Solutions Inc., [2003] 4 F.C. 713 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 29/4/04.

Via Rail Canada Inc. v. Cairns, A‑273‑03, 2003 FCA 319, Rothstein J.A., judgment dated 13/8/03 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 22/4/04.

Webster v. Canada, A‑50‑03, 2003 FCA 388, Sharlow J.A., judgment dated 21/10/03 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 15/4/04.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.