APPEALS NOTED
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
Canada (Human Rights Commission) v. Canada Post Corp., [2004] 2 F.C.R. 581 (F.C.), has been affirmed on appeal (A‑92‑04, 2004 FCA 363), reasons for judgment handed down 25/10/04.
Froom v. Canada (Minister of Justice), [2004] 2 F.C.R. 154 (F.C.), has been affirmed on appeal (A‑570‑03, 2004 FCA 352). The reasons for judgment handed down 21/10/04, will be published in the Federal Courts Reports.
SUPREME COURT OF CANADA
Hodge v. Canada (Minister of Human Resources Development), [2003] 1 F.C. 271 (C.A.), was reversed by a decision dated 28/10/04, and will be published in the Supreme Court Reports.
Applications for Leave to Appeal
à
CC Havanos Corp. (Re), A‑565‑02, [2004] 3 F.C.R. 589 (C.A.) Létourneau J.A., judgment dated 17/3/04 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 4/11/04.
Canada (Attorney General) v. Bellemare, A‑598‑99, Noël J.A., judgment dated 30/11/00 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 18/11/04.
Canada (Canadian Human Rights Commission) v. Canadian Airlines International Ltd., A‑481‑01, 2004 FCA 113, Rothstein J.A., judgment dated 18/3/04 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. granted 18/11/04.
Leskiw v. Canada (Attorney General), A‑192‑03, 2004 FCA 177, Strayer J.A., judgment dated 3/5/04 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 18/11/04.
Medovarski v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), A‑249‑03, 2004 FCA 85, Evans J.A., judgment dated 3/3/04 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. granted 12/11/04.
Petro‑Canada v. Canada, A‑2‑03, 2004 FCA 158, Sharlow J.A., judgment dated 23/4/04 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 18/11/04.
Sogi v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), A‑597‑03, 2004 FCA 212, Rothstein J.A., judgment dated 28/5/04 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 18/11/04.
Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin v. Boutique Cliquot Ltée, A‑116‑03, 2004 FCA 164, Noël J.A., judgment dated 22/4/04 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. granted 18/11/04.