APPEALS NOTED
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
Fédération Franco-Ténoise v. Canada, [2001] 1 F.C. 241 (T.D.), has been reversed on appeal (A-555-00). The reasons for judgment, handed down 4/7/01, will be published in the Federal Court Reports.
Shilling v. M.N.R., [1999] 4 F.C. 178 (T.D.), has been reversed on appeal (A-558-99). The reasons for judgment, handed down 4/6/01, will be published in the Federal Court Reports.
SUPREME COURT OF CANADA
Applications for leave to appeal
Figueroa v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2001] 3 F.C. D-22 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 27/9/01.
Madsen v. Canada, A-267-98, Linden J.A., judgment dated 22/12/00 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 23/8/01.
Canada (Attorney General) v. Canada (Information Commissioner), A-674-00, [2001] 2 F.C. 502, judgment by the Court dated 1/3/01 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 13/9/01.
Chiau v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2001] 2 F.C. 297 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 16/8/01.
Canada (Commissioner of Competition) v. Superior Propane Inc., [2001] 3 F.C. 185 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 13/9/01.
Ludco Enterprises Ltd. v. Canada, [1999] 2 F.C. D-69 (C.A.), was reversed by a decision dated 28/9/01, and will be published in the Supreme Court Reports.
Hodgson v. Ermineskin Indian Band No. 942, [2001] 1 F.C. D-48 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 6/9/01.
Oxford Building Maintenance Engineering v. Canada (Public Works and Government Services), A-577-99, Rothstein J.A., judgment dated 24/10/00 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 6/9/01.
Pfizer Canada Inc. v. Apotex Inc., [2001] 2 F.C. D-27 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 27/9/01.
Windsor (City) v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co., [2001] 1 F.C. D-11 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 21/6/01.
Federated Co-operatives Ltd. v. Canada, [2001] 3 F.C. D-15 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 30/8/01
Millette v. M.N.R., A-593-99, [2001] 3 F.C. 127, Nöel J.A., judgment dated 2/4/01 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 27/9/01.
Eli Lilly and Co. v. Novopharm Ltd., [2001] 2 F.C. 502 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 21/6/01.
Gagnon v. Transport Thom Ltée, A-786-99, Létourneau J.A., judgment dated 26/1/01 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 6/9/01.
Scheuneman v. Canada (Attorney General), [2001] 1 F.C. D-53 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 21/6/01.
Canada (Information Commissioner) v. Canada (Commissioner of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police), [2001] 3 F.C. 70 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. granted, 13/9/01.
Pasquan v. Canada (Deputy Attorney General), A-518-99, Noël J.A., judgment dated 23/1/01 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 30/8/01.
United Grain Growers Ltd. v. Lang Michener, [2001] 3 F.C. 102 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. granted, 13/9/01.
Hiebert v. Canada (Correctional Service), A-461-00, [2001] 2 F.C. 297, Richard C.J., judgment dated 6/3/01 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 30/8/01.
Singleton v. Canada, [1999] 4 F.C. 484 (C.A.), was affirmed by a decision dated 28/9/01, and will be published in the Supreme Court Reports.
Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha v. Lexus Foods Inc., [2001] 2 F.C. 15 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 12/6/01.
Z.I. Pompey Industries v. Canmar Fortune (The), [2001] 2 F.C. D-23 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. granted, 6/9/01.
ITV Technologies Inc. v. WIC Television Ltd., A-513-99, [2001] 2 F.C. 297, Sharlow J.A., judgment dated 8/2/01 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 6/9/01.
Weeks v. Canada, A-158-99, Sharlow J.A., judgment dated 12/12/00 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 30/8/01.
Wellcome Foundation Ltd. v. Apotex Inc., [2001] 2 F.C. 618 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 30/8/01.
Asselin v. Canada (Minister of Transport), A-191-00, Desjardins J.A., judgment dated 16/1/01 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 6/9/01.
Cardella v. Canada, [2001] 3 F.C. D-11 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 30/8/01.
McLean v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2001] 3 F.C. 127 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 30/8/01.