Information on Appeals

Decision Information

Decision Content

APPEALS NOTED

FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

Benitez v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2007] 1 F.C.R. 107 (F.C.), has been affirmed on appeal (A‑164‑06, A‑187‑06, A‑188‑06, A‑196‑06, A‑197‑06, A‑198‑06, A‑199‑06, A‑200‑06, 2007 FCA 199). The reasons for judgment handed down 25/5/07, will be published in the Federal Courts Reports.

Canada (Information Commissioner) v. Canada (Minister of Industry), [2006] 4 F.C.R. 241 (F.C.), has been affirmed on appeal (A‑107‑06, 2007 FCA 212, Evans J.A. dissenting). The reasons for judgment handed down 1/6/07, will be published in the Federal Courts Reports.

Chu v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2007] 2 F.C.R. 578 (F.C.), has been affirmed on appeal (A‑363‑06, 2007 FCA 205), reasons for judgment handed down 29/5/07.

G.D. Searle & Co. v. Novopharm Ltd., T-1067-05, 2007 FC 81, Hughes J., judgment dated 24/1/07, which will be published in the Federal Courts Reports, has been reversed on appeal (A‑66‑07, 2007 FCA 173). The reasons for judgment handed down 30/4/07, will be published in the Federal Courts Reports.

Garcia v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2006] 4 F.C.R. 455 (F.C.), has been reversed on appeal (A-142-06, 2007 FCA 75). The reasons for judgment handed down 16/3/07, will be published in the Federal Courts Reports.

Hinzman v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2007] 1 F.C.R. 561 (F.C.), has been affirmed on appeal (A‑182‑06, A‑185‑06, 2007 FCA 171), reasons for judgment handed down 30/4/07.

Pfizer Canada Inc. v. Canada (Minister of Health) (T‑586-06, 2007 FC 446) has been affirmed on appeal (A-262-07, 2007 FCA 261), reasons for judgment handed down 24/7/07.

Pfizer Canada Inc. v. Canada (Minister of Health) (T‑507-05, 2007 FC 205), has been affirmed on appeal (A‑109-07, 2007 FCA 244), reasons for judgment handed down 20/6/07.

Samimifar v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) (IMM-6468-03, 2006 FC 1301), has been affirmed on appeal (A-485-06, 2007 FCA 248), reasons for judgment handed down 25/6/07.

Thamotharem v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2006] 3 F.C.R. 168 (F.C.) ,has been reversed on appeal (A‑38‑06, 2007 FCA 198). The reasons for judgment handed down 25/5/07, will be published in the Federal Courts Reports.

SUPREME COURT OF CANADA

Addison & Leyen Ltd. v. Canada, [2006] 4 F.C.R. 532 (F.C.A.), was reversed by a decision dated 12/7/07 and will be published in the Supreme Court Reports.

Kraft Canada Inc. v. Euro Excellence Inc., [2006] 3 F.C.R. 91 (F.C.A.), was reversed by a decision dated 26/7/07 and will be published in the Supreme Court Reports.

Applications for leave to appeal

Abbott v. Canada, A‑93‑05, 2006 FCA 342, Pelletier J.A., judgment dated 20/10/06, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 10/5/07.

Andrews v. Canada (Attorney General), A-128-06, 2006 FCA 411, Desjardins J.A., judgment dated 15/12/06, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 12/7/07.

Boudreau v. M.N.R., A‑248‑05, 2007 FCA 32, Pelletier J.A., judgment dated 5/2/07, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 17/5/07.

Caisse populaire Desjardins de l’est de Drummond v. Canada, A‑624‑05, 2006 FCA 366, Létourneau J.A., judgment dated 8/11/06, leave to appeal to S.C.C. granted 24/5/07.

Canada (Commissioner of Competition) v. Canada Pipe Co., [2007] 2 F.C.R. 3 (F.C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 10/5/07.

Canada (Commissioner of Competition) v. Canada Pipe Co., [2007] 2 F.C.R. 57 (F.C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 10/5/07.

Canada Post Corp. v. United States Postal Service, A‑633-05, 2007 FCA 10, Sharlow J.A., judgment dated 9/1/07, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 28/6/07.

Canada v. Dawn’s Place Ltd., A‑606‑05, 2006 FCA 349, Sharlow J.A., judgment dated 27/10/06, will be published in the Federal Courts Reports, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 10/5/07.

Chopra v. Canada (Treasury Board), A‑351‑05, 2006 FCA 295, Evans J.A., judgment dated 6/9/06, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 10/5/07.

Desrochers v. Canada (Industry), [2007] 3 F.C.R. 3 (F.C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. granted 31/6/07.

Ding v. Canada, A‑108‑06, 2007 FCA 11, Sharlow J.A., judgment dated 10/1/07, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 10/5/07.

Genex Communications v. Canada (Attorney General), [2006] 2 F.C.R. 199 (F.C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 14/6/07.

Gosselin v. Canada (Attorney General), A‑46‑06, 2006 FCA 405, Létourneau J.A., judgment dated 13/12/06, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 24/5/07.

H.J. Heinz Co. of Canada Ltd. v. Canada (Attorney General), A‑505‑05, A‑506‑05, 2006 FCA 378, Pelletier J.A., judgment dated 17/11/06, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 10/5/07.

Hung v. Canada (Attorney General), A-262-06, 2007 FCA 17, Décary, Noël and Pelletier JJ.A., judgment dated 11/1/07, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 28/6/07.

Jose Pereira E. Hijos, S.A. v. Canada (Attorney General), A-430-05, 2007 FCA 20, Nadon J.A., judgment dated 12/1/07, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 5/7/07.

Lessard v. Canada, A-67-06, 2007 FCA 9, Décary J.A., judgment dated 8/1/07, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 7/6/07.

MTS Allstream Inc. v. Toronto (City), A‑653‑05, A‑654‑05, 2006 FCA 385, Evans J.A., judgment dated 27/11/06, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 24/11/06.

Marchand Syndics Inc. v. Laperrière, A‑658‑04, 2006 FCA 368, Létourneau J.A., judgment dated 10/11/06, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 10/5/07.

Merck & Co., Inc. v. Apotex Inc., A‑232‑06, 2006 FCA 323, Malone J.A., judgment dated 10/10/06, will be published in the Federal Courts Reports, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 10/5/07.

Nazifpour v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), A-20-06, A-79-06, 2007 FCA 35, Evans J.A., judgment dated 8/2/07, will be published in the Federal Courts Reports, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 28/6/07.

Read v. Canada (Attorney General), A‑314‑05, 2006 FCA 283, Nadon J.A., judgment dated 22/8/06, will be published in the Federal Courts Reports, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 10/5/07.

Redeemer Foundation v. M.N.R., A‑551‑05, 2006 FCA 325, Pelletier J.A., judgment dated 10/10/06, will be published in the Federal Courts Reports, leave to appeal to S.C.C. granted 10/5/07.

Sanofi-Aventis Canada Inc. v. Canada (Minister of Health), A-1-07, 2007 FCA 71, Sexton J.A., judgment dated 12/2/07, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 28/6/07.

Sanofi-Synthelabo Canada Inc. v. Apotex Inc., A-168-05, 2006 FCA 421, Noël J.A., judgment dated 22/12/06, leave to appeal to S.C.C. granted 5/7/07.

Scott Paper Ltd. v. Canada, A‑513‑05, 2006 FCA 372, Nadon J.A., judgment dated 17/11/07, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 10/5/07.

Taylor v. Canada, A-16-06, A-17-06, A-18-06, 2007 FCA 45, Evans J.A., judgment dated 15/1/07, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 5/7/07.

Tremblay v. M.N.R., A‑689‑04, A‑690‑04, A‑691‑04, A‑693‑04, A‑694‑04, A‑695‑04, A‑696‑04, A‑697‑04, A‑698‑04, A‑699‑04, A‑701‑04, A‑702‑04, A‑704‑04, A‑705‑04, 2006 FCA 392, Noël J.A., judgment dated 30/11/06, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 31/5/07.

xxxTremblay c. M.R.N., A‑689‑04, A‑690‑04, A‑691‑04, A‑693‑04, A‑694‑04, A‑695‑04, A‑696‑04, A‑697‑04, A‑698‑04, A‑699‑04, A‑701‑04, A‑702‑04, A‑704‑04, A‑705‑04, 2006 CAF 392, le juge Noël, J.C.A., jugement en date du 30‑11‑06, autorisation de pourvoi à la C.S.C. refusée, 31‑5‑07.

Vasarhelyi v. Canada, A‑179‑06, A‑180‑06, 2007 FCA 4, Sharlow J.A., judgment dated 4/1/07, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 24/5/07.

Vasarhelyi c. Canada, A‑179‑06, A‑180‑06, 2007 CAF 4, la juge Sharlow, J.C.A., jugement en date du 4‑1‑07, autorisation de pourvoi à la C.S.C. refusée, 24‑5‑07.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.