Information on Appeals

Decision Information

Decision Content

APPEALS NOTED

FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

Benitez v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2007] 1 F.C.R. 107 (F.C.), has been affirmed on appeal (A‑164‑06, A‑187‑06, A‑188‑06, A‑196‑06, A‑197‑06, A‑198‑06, A‑199‑06, A‑200‑06, 2007 FCA 199). The reasons for judgment handed down 25/5/07, will be published in the Federal Courts Reports.

Canada (Information Commissioner) v. Canada (Minister of Industry), [2006] 4 F.C.R. 241 (F.C.), has been affirmed on appeal (A‑107‑06, 2007 FCA 212, Evans J.A. dissenting). The reasons for judgment handed down 1/6/07, will be published in the Federal Courts Reports.

Chu v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2007] 2 F.C.R. 578 (F.C.), has been affirmed on appeal (A‑363‑06, 2007 FCA 205), reasons for judgment handed down 29/5/07.

G.D. Searle & Co. v. Novopharm Ltd., T-1067-05, 2007 FC 81, Hughes J., judgment dated 24/1/07, which will be published in the Federal Courts Reports, has been reversed on appeal (A‑66‑07, 2007 FCA 173). The reasons for judgment handed down 30/4/07, will be published in the Federal Courts Reports.

Hinzman v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2007] 1 F.C.R. 561 (F.C.), has been affirmed on appeal (A‑182‑06, A‑185‑06, 2007 FCA 171), reasons for judgment handed down 30/4/07.

Thamotharem v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2006] 3 F.C.R. 168 (F.C.) ,has been reversed on appeal (A‑38‑06, 2007 FCA 198). The reasons for judgment handed down 25/5/07, will be published in the Federal Courts Reports.

SUPREME COURT OF CANADA

Applications for leave to appeal

Abbott v. Canada, A‑93‑05, 2006 FCA 342, Pelletier J.A., judgment dated 20/10/06, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 10/5/07.

Boudreau v. M.N.R., A‑248‑05, 2007 FCA 32, Pelletier J.A., judgment dated 5/2/07, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 17/5/07.

Caisse populaire Desjardins de l’est de Drummond v. Canada, A‑624‑05, 2006 FCA 366, Létourneau J.A., judgment dated 8/11/06, leave to appeal to S.C.C. granted 24/5/07.

Canada (Commissioner of Competition) v. Canada Pipe Co., [2007] 2 F.C.R. 3 (F.C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 10/5/07.

Canada (Commissioner of Competition) v. Canada Pipe Co., [2007] 2 F.C.R. 57 (F.C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 10/5/07.

Canada v. Dawn’s Place Ltd., A‑606‑05, 2006 FCA 349, Sharlow J.A., judgment dated 27/10/06, will be published in the Federal Courts Reports, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 10/5/07.

Chopra v. Canada (Treasury Board), A‑351‑05, 2006 FCA 295, Evans J.A., judgment dated 6/9/06, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 10/5/07.

Ding v. Canada, A‑108‑06, 2007 FCA 11, Sharlow J.A., judgment dated 10/1/07, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 10/5/07.

Gosselin v. Canada (Attorney General), A‑46‑06, 2006 FCA 405, Létourneau J.A., judgment dated 13/12/06, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 24/5/07.

H.J. Heinz Co. of Canada Ltd. v. Canada (Attorney General), A‑505‑05, A‑506‑05, 2006 FCA 378, Pelletier J.A., judgment dated 17/11/06, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 10/5/07.

MTS Allstream Inc. v. Toronto (City), A‑653‑05, A‑654‑05, 2006 FCA 385, Evans J.A., judgment dated 27/11/06, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 24/11/06.

Marchand Syndics Inc. v. Laperrière, A‑658‑04, 2006 FCA 368, Létourneau J.A., judgment dated 10/11/06, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 10/5/07.

Merck & Co., Inc. v. Apotex Inc., A‑232‑06, 2006 FCA 323, Malone J.A., judgment dated 10/10/06, will be published in the Federal Courts Reports, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 10/5/07.

Read v. Canada (Attorney General), A‑314‑05, 2006 FCA 283, Nadon J.A., judgment dated 22/8/06, will be published in the Federal Courts Reports, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 10/5/07.

Redeemer Foundation v. M.N.R., A‑551‑05, 2006 FCA 325, Pelletier J.A., judgment dated 10/10/06, will be published in the Federal Courts Reports, leave to appeal to S.C.C. granted 10/5/07.

Scott Paper Ltd. v. Canada, A‑513‑05, 2006 FCA 372, Nadon J.A., judgment dated 17/11/07, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 10/5/07.

Tremblay v. M.N.R., A‑689‑04, A‑690‑04, A‑691‑04, A‑693‑04, A‑694‑04, A‑695‑04, A‑696‑04, A‑697‑04, A‑698‑04, A‑699‑04, A‑701‑04, A‑702‑04, A‑704‑04, A‑705‑04, 2006 FCA 392, Noël J.A., judgment dated 30/11/06, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 31/5/07.

Vasarhelyi v. Canada, A‑179‑06, A‑180‑06, 2007 FCA 4, Sharlow J.A., judgment dated 4/1/07, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 24/5/07.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.