Information on Appeals

Decision Information

Decision Content

APPEALS NOTED

FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

Canada Post Corp. v. United States Postal Service, [2006] 3 F.C.R. 28 (F.C.), has been affirmed on appeal (A-633-05, 2007 FCA 10), reasons for judgment handed down 9/1/07.

Canadian Private Copying Collective v. Cano Tech Inc., [2006] 3 F.C.R. 581 (F.C.), has been affirmed on appeal (A-56-06, 2007 FCA 14), reasons for judgment handed down 10/1/07.

Desrochers v. Canada (Industry), [2005] 4 F.C.R. 3 (F.C.), has been reversed in part on appeal (A-451-05, 2006 FCA 374). The reasons for judgment handed down 17/11/06, will be published in the Federal Courts Reports.

Leth Farms Ltd.  v. Canada (Attorney General), [2006] 3 F.C.R. 633 (F.C.),  has been reversed on appeal (A‑74‑06, 2007 FCA 49).  The reasons for judgment handed down 31/1/07, will be published in the Federal Courts Reports.

SUPREME COURT OF CANADA

Charkaoui (Re), [2005] 2 F.C.R. 299 (F.C.A.), was reversed by a decision dated 23/2/07 and will be published in the Supreme Court Reports.

Applications for leave to appeal

Abbott Laboratories v. Canada (Minister of Health), A‑384-05, 2006 FCA 187, Sharlow J.A., judgment dated 18/5/06, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 8/2/07.

Canada v. Roitman, A-535-05, 2006 FCA 266, Décary J.A., judgment dated 27/7/06, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 7/12/06.

Deacon v. Canada (Attorney General), A-580-05, 2006 FCA 265, Linden J.A., judgment dated 26/7/06, will be published in the Federal Courts Reports, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 11/1/07.

Hammill v. Canada, A-507-04, 2005 FCA 252, Noël J.A., judgment dated 7/7/05, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 18/1/07.

Johnson & Johnson Inc. v. Boston Scientific Ltd., A‑666-04, A-667-04, 2006 FCA 195, Sharlow J.A., judgment dated 23/5/06, will be published in the Federal Courts Reports, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 18/1/07. (See also: Johnson & Johnson Inc. v. Arterial Vascular Engineering Canada, Inc.).

McLarty c. Canada, A-85-05, 2006 CAF 152, le juge Sexton, J.C.A., jugement en date du 27-4-06, autorisation de pourvoi à la C.S.C. accordée, 22-2-07.

Pfizer Canada Inc. v. Canada (Minister of Health), A‑75-06, 2006 FCA 214, Malone J.A., judgment dated 9/6/06, will be published in the Federal Courts Reports, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 1/2/06.

Sawridge Band v. Canada, A-552-05, A-554-05, 2006 FCA 228, Evans J.A., judgment dated 19/6/06, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 8/2/07.

Scheuneman v. Canada (Attorney General), A-484-04, 2006 FCA 181, Linden J.A., judgment dated 16/5/06, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 14/12/06.

620 Connaught Ltd. v. Canada (Attorney General), A‑400-05, 2006 FCA 252, Evans J.A., judgment dated 6/7/06, will be published in the Federal Courts Reports, leave to appeal to S.C.C. granted 1/2/06.

Stohl v. Canada, A-531-04, 2006 FCA 162, Décary J.A., judgment dated 4/5/06, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 22/2/07.

Stohl c. Canada, A-531-04, 2006 CAF 162, le juge Décary, J.C.A., jugement en date du 4-5-06, autorisation de pourvoi à la C.S.C. refusée, 22-2-07.

St-Georges v. Canada, A-700-04, 2006 FCA 207, Noël J.A., judgment dated 7/6/06, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 22/2/07.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.