Information on Appeals

Decision Information

2002, Vol. 1, Part 3

Collection Information on Appeals
Date 2002-01-01

Decision Content

APPEALS NOTED

FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

Société des alcools du Québec v. Canada, [2001] 1 F.C. 386 (T.D.), has been affirmed on appeal (A-571-00; [2001] 1 F.C. 386), reasons for judg­ment handed down 22/2/02.

Stamicarbon B.V. v. Urea Casale S.A., [2001] 1 F.C. 172 (T.D.), has been reversed in part on appeal (A-512-00). The reasons for judgment, handed down 15/1/02, will be published in the Federal Court Reports.

Collins v. Canada, [2000] 2 F.C. 3 (T.D.), has been affirmed on appeal (A-753-99; [2000] 2 F.C. 3). The reasons for judgment, handed down 1/3/02, will be published in the Federal Court Reports.

Qu v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigra­tion), [2000] 4 F.C. 71 (T.D.), has been reversed on appeal (A-289-00). The reasons for judgment, handed down 21/12/01, will be reported in the Federal Court Reports.

Conohan v. Cooperators, [2001] 2 F.C. 238 (T.D.), has been affirmed on appeal (A-779-00; [2001] 2 F.C. 238). The reasons for judgment, handed down 11/2/02, will be published in the Federal Court Reports.

SUPREME COURT OF CANADA

Applications for leave to appeal

Inverhuron & District Ratepayers' Assn. v. Canada (Minister of the Environment), [2001] 4 F.C. D-24 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 7/3/02.

Shilling v. M.N.R., [2001] 4 F.C. 364 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 14/3/02.

Hsu v. Canada, [2001] 4 F.C. D-28 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 14/3/02.

Canada v. Monias, [2002] 1 F.C. 51 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 14/3/02.

Krock c. Canada (Procureur général), [2001] 4 C.F. F-2 (C.A.), autorisation de pourvoi à la C.S.C. refu­sée, 21-2-02.

Mohammadian v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2001] 4 F.C. 85 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 7/3/02.

Sarvanis v. Canada, [2000] 2 F.C. D-10 (C.A.), was reversed by a decision dated 21/3/02, and will be published in the Supreme Court Reports.

Lavoie v. Canada, [2000] 1 F.C. 3 (C.A.), was affirmed by a decision dated 8/3/02, and will be published in the Supreme Court Reports.

Chu v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2001] 3 F.C. D-3 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 24/1/02.

1185740 Ontario Ltd. v. M.N.R., [2001] 4 F.C. D-24 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 31/1/02.

Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Obodzinsky, A-688-00, [2002] 1 F.C. 51, Létourneau J.A., judgment dated 23/5/01 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 14/2/02.

Olmstead v. Canada (Attorney General), A-689-99, Sharlow J.A., judgment dated 7/12/00 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 7/3/02.

Huyck v. Musqueam Indian Band, [2001] 3 F.C. D-33 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 7/3/02.

Caron v. Canada, A-712-99, [2002] 1 F.C. 51, Létourneau J.A., judgment dated 30/5/01 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 14/3/02.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.