Information on Appeals

Decision Information

Decision Content

APPEALS NOTED

FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

Canada Post Corp. v. Barrette, [1999] 2 F.C. 250 (T.D.), has been reversed on appeal (A-36-99). The reasons for judgment, handed down 20/4/00, will be published in the Federal Court Reports.

Zündel v. Citron, [1999] 3 F.C. 409 (T.D.), has been reversed on appeal (A-253-99). The reasons for judgment, handed down 18/5/00, will be published in the Federal Court Reports.

Apotex Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), [1997] 1 F.C. 518 (T.D.), has been affirmed on appeal (A-922-96). The reasons for judgment, handed down 12/05/00, will be published in the Federal Court Reports.

SUPREME COURT OF CANADA

Granovsky v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), [1998] 3 F.C. 175 (C.A.), was affirmed by a decision dated 18/5/00, and will be published in the Supreme Court Reports.

Applications for leave to appeal

Suresh v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2000] 2 F.C. 592 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. granted, 25/5/00.

Lavoie v. Canada, [2000] 1 F.C. 3 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. granted, 25/5/00.

Trussler v. Canada, [1999] 3 F.C. D-46 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 1/6/00.

Canadian Pacific Forest Products Ltd.-Tahsis Pacific Region v. Beltimber (The), [1999] 4 F.C. 320 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 25/5/00.

Ahani v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), A-413-99, Robertson J.A., judgment dated 18/1/00 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. granted, 25/5/00.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.