Digests

Decision Information

Decision Content

PUBLIC SERVICE

Selection Process

Sherb v. Canada (Attorney General)

T-653-03

2004 FC 247, Phelan J.

18/2/04

9 pp.

Judicial review of decision Public Service Commission (PSC) had no jurisdiction to conduct review of qualifications for position under Public Service Employment Act, s. 12.1 after selection process completed--Basis for decision found in Canada (Attorney General) v. Asselin (1999), 253 N.R. 388 (F.C.A.)--PSC has jurisdiction to review qualifications established by deputy heads without being limited to pre- or post-selection time frames--As consequence, request for investigation of qualification requirement can be made at any time--S. 12.1 permitting Commission to review qualifications for appointment to any position to ensure they afford basis for selection according to merit--"Affords" future-looking but used in context of "qualifications established by deputy head"--S.12.1 silent about precluding request for investigation when selection process concluded--Asselin, supra, not operating to preclude person such as applicant from making request under s. 12.1 in respect of future selection processes and qualifications thereof --Court of Appeal appeared to accept s. 12.1 could be invoked as free-standing provision separate from appeal process--Important to distinguish first, between investigation and appeal and second, between jurisdiction and remedy--As merit principle overarching value expressed in Act, s. 12.1 must be interpreted in manner adhering to principle, absent clear language to contrary--Acknowledging PSC's jurisdic-tion to review qualifications not contrary to concept of finality --Issues with respect to remedy appropriate place to focus on principle of finality--S. 12.1 contains no express or implied time limitation--For purposes of considering scope of s. 12.1, dealing with jurisdiction not remedy--No reason to impose by implication any such time limit--Application allowed--Public Service Employment Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. P-33, s. 12.1 (as enacted by S.C. 1992, c. 54, s. 11).

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.