Digests

Decision Information

Decision Content

[2017] 2 F.C.R. D-6

Income Tax

Corporations

Directors

Appeals from Tax Court of Canada (T.C.C.) decisions (2014 TCC 254) — Appeals arising from two separate appeals from two separate assessments, both of which imposing liability on respondents on basis respondents directors — T.C.C. finding respondents having resigned as directors, setting aside Minister of National Revenue assessments — In 2001, respondents stating to spouses, owners of 1056922 Ontario Limited (105 Ltd.) intention to resign as directors — Respondent in first appeal (first respondent) instructing solicitor to draft resignations for both respondents but resignations never executed, never leaving law office — Later, spouse of respondent in second appeal (second respondent) instructing different lawyer to prepare resignation documents solely for second respondent — For five-year period, 105 Ltd. failing to remit payroll tax withholdings — Income Tax Act, R.S.C., 1985 (5th Supp.), c. 1 rendering directors of company failing to remit source deductions personally liable for unremitted amounts but directors may raise due diligence defence under Act, s. 227.1(3) — Respondents assessed for these liabilities — Respondents appealing tax assessments — T.C.C. concluding that preparation of draft letters of resignation, combined with fact respondents verbally communicating to spouses tendering resignations resulting in effective resignation — Alternatively, finding that if resignations not effective, first respondent having reasonable belief having resigned but not second respondent — Whether T.C.C. erring in finding that respondents resigned as directors of 105 Ltd., thus not personally liable for corporation’s unremitted tax withholdings; whether T.C.C. erring in alternative finding first respondent having reasonable belief having resigned but not second respondent; whether T.C.C. erring in finding that, even if respondents directors, not exercising due diligence — T.C.C. erring in concluding that respondents resigning as directors — In absence of communication of written resignation to corporation, resignation not effective — On facts before T.C.C., respondents not resigning in 2001 — Pursuant to Ontario Business Corporations Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. B.16 (OBCA), s. 121(2), director’s resignation becoming effective at time written resignation received by corporation or at time specified in resignation — In present case, no written resignation received by 105 Ltd. within meaning of OBCA, s. 121(2) — Unsigned letters of resignation with no effective date found in solicitor’s file thus T.C.C. erring in concluding that respondents’ intention to resign satisfying necessary preconditions of effective resignation — Regarding reasonable belief in resignation, T.C.C. committing error on extricable question of law in finding that first respondent exercising due diligence — Director may be able to rely on reasonable belief in having resigned to ground due diligence defence but standard must be much higher than one applied by T.C.C. herein — Director’s belief having resigned having no correspondence or connection to underlying purposes of OBCA, s. 121(2), emphasis on objectively verifiable communication of resignation to corporation — Due diligence defences arising only by virtue of Act, s. 227.1(3) — To satisfy s. 227.1(3) defence, director must establish turning attention to required remittances, exercising duty of care, diligence, skill with view to preventing failure by corporation to remit concerned amounts — T.C.C. not considering due diligence defence in light of established principles — Director cannot raise due diligence defence by relying on own indifferent or casual attitude to responsibilities — Reasonable director would insist on being satisfied that intention to resign effected — T.C.C. not erring in rejecting second respondent’s due diligence defence — Finally, T.C.C. right to reject respondents’ alternative argument that, even if still directors, exercising due diligence — Appeals allowed.

Canada v. Chriss (A-137-15; A-138-15, 2016 FCA 236, Rennie J.A., judgment dated September 22, 2016, 10 pp.)

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.