Digests

Decision Information

Decision Content

PRACTICE

Privilege

Perera v. Canada

T-608-92

Hugessen J.

20/10/00

9 pp.

Motion seeking production of materials in possession of defendant to which latter has made claim of privilege of confidentiality--Materials sought result of voluntary self-identification of visible minorities employed by CIDA of which plaintiff also employee--Action itself claim for Charter-based relief founded upon allegation of discrimination, both personal, systemic--For period between 1985 and 1996, collection of data pursuant to government's employment equity policy--Claim for privilege for that period at common law, under Canada Evidence Act, s. 37--Exercise of balancing of interests, those which favour disclosure against those which favour maintenance of confidentiality, similar to what is mandated by s. 37--No discretion in Court to override Parliament's declaration of confidential nature of information provided contained in Employment Equity Act, s. 9(3)--Voluntary self-identification essential to proper functioning of employment equity--To reveal identities in breach of undertaking of confidentiality would be breach of trust--Unless s. 9(3) itself in breach of Charter, it must apply to Charter claims as to all others--For neither period should government disclose material in present form--Employment equity information collected by government relevant information for purposes of plaintiff's action, accordingly discoverable--Information in question to be protected, confidential--Voluntary self-identification materials in possession of Crown privileged, confidential, shall not be disclosed save as provided herein, as may be subsequently ordered--Motion dismissed--Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, being Part I of the Constitution Act, 1982, Schedule B, Canada Act, 1982, 1982, c. 11 (U.K.) [R.S.C., 1985, Appendix II, No. 44]--Canada Evidence Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. C-5, s. 37--Employment Equity Act, S.C. 1995, c. 44, s. 9(3).

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.