Digests

Decision Information

Decision Content

CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

Immigration Practice

Kalachnikov v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)

IMM-3797-02

2003 FCT 777, Snider J.

26/6/03

10 pp.

Judicial review directing respondent Minister to process application for permanent residence and issue final decision within 60 days of Court's order--As of date of hearing, almost three years have elapsed since application documentation completed in July 2000--Issue whether mandamus justified having regard to excessive delay-- Application allowed, although on different terms than proposed by applicant--Public legal duty to act: Immigration Act, s. 9(2) placing duty on respondent to assess applicant's application for permanent residence--Duty owed to applicant --Applicant has satisfied all conditions precedent giving rise to duty--Clear right of performance herein--Applicant had made at least 15 requests for information regarding status of application--Respondent has been given reasonable amount of time to comply with demand for performance of his duty, to complete background checks, process application--Delay unreasonable--Unsatisfactory justification for having taken nearly three years to process application for permanent residence--No other remedy available to applicant--Balance of convenience lying with applicant--Respondent allowed further 6 months to process application, rather than 60 days requested by applicant; respondent may make application to Court for extension of time beyond 6 months to process application, with adequate justification.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.