Digests

Decision Information

Decision Content

Canada Trustco Mortgage Co. v. Huron Shores Real Estate Inc.

T-1909-94

McKeown J.

6/10/94

7 pp.

Plaintiffs seek interlocutory injunction to restrain defendant from trade mark infringement, unfairly trading on goodwill, false representation -- Plaintiff, CTMC, granted defendant exclusive right to use CT Home Realty Franchise System in Sarnia/Lambton area for 5 years with renewal option -- Two years later, Canada Trustco entered partnership with Coldwell Banker for residential real estate franchising business -- CT Home Realty franchisees invited to join new Coldwell Banker -- Defendant refused -- Defendant says services to which entitled deteriorated after new Coldwell Banker created -- Defendant alleged breach of licence agreement, ceased paying service fee -- CT terminating agreement for defendant's default -- Defendant told to discontinue use of "Canada Trust" trade mark -- Plaintiffs say defendant continuing to represent itself as affiliated with CTMC -- Whether CTMC justified in commencing action having established new franchise system with Coldwell Banker -- Usual tests for granting interlocutory injunction -- Plaintiffs rely on Fruit of the Loom, Inc. v. Chateau Lingerie Mfg. Co. Ltd. (1982), 63 C.P.R. (2d) 51 (F.C.T.D.) -- In seeking injunctive relief, plaintiff must come to court with clean hands -- Defendant having sued plaintiffs in Ontario Court (General Division) for specific performance of franchise agreement and other relief -- Question whether franchise agreement still in effect is determinative of plaintiffs' right to injunction -- Serious issue is whether specific performance action will succeed -- Renewal issue will come into play if action succeeds -- Plaintiffs' position that renewals unavailable -- Defendant submits plaintiffs want out of real estate business and if interlocutory injunction granted, plaintiffs benefitting from breach of contract -- Status quo should be maintained -- Application denied if defendant pays into trust account share of income provided for in franchise agreement.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.