CTIIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION
Status in Canada
Convention Refugees
Judicial review of Immigration Appeal Division’s (IAD) refusal to reopen appeal from removal order and from Refugee Protection Division’s refusal to reopen refugee claim—IAD did not wrongly interpret, apply Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, s. 71 as mere existence of new evidence not ground supporting reopening of claim under s. 71—With respect to reopening of refugee claim, Refugee Protection Division Rules, r. 55requiring absence, breach of principle of natural justice—No such breach here—Applications dismissed —Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, S.C. 2001, c. 27, s. 71—Refugee Protection Division Rules, SOR/2002‑228, r. 55.
Nazifpour v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) (IMM‑7688‑04, IMM‑10094‑04, 2005 FC 1694, Heneghan J., order dated 14/12/05, 12 pp.)