Digests

Decision Information

Decision Content

PAROLE

Unrau v. Canada (Attorney General)

T-872-99

MacKay J.

8/9/00

7 pp.

Application for judicial review of National Parole Board Appeal Division decision dismissing applicant's appeal from Board decision denying request for day parole--Applicant seeking to have both decisions set aside--Proceedings for judicial review concern single decision--Here, Appeal Division decision properly before Court--Review of its decision, if redressable error found, can lead to appropriate relief by or through direction to Appeal Division--Application dismissed--Applicant alleging Appeal Division used wrong test for parole eligibility under Act, s. 102(a), or misapplied right test--No evidence Board only considered whether risk, not whether risk, if found, undue--Board's finding in this regard confirmed by Appeal Division--Question of mixed fact and law squarely within expertise of Board first, and of Appeal Division as question of law where raised on appeal, as herein--Appeal Division's finding Board's finding reasonable itself reasonable decision, and indeed correct--Appeal Division did not err in concluding evidence to support Board's conclusions--Appeal Division also correctly found hearing before Board fair--Corrections and Conditional Release Act, S.C. 1992, c. 20, s. 102.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.