PENITENTIARIES
Judicial review of Senior Deputy Commissioner’s decision upholding applicant’s third-level grievance that medium-security classification should not have been overridden to maximum security, but not ordering reassessment of classification or ordering applicant be recommended for medium-security classification—Failure to provide applicant with reasonably detailed summary of additional information gathered for purpose of third-level grievance analysis not violation of Corrections and Conditional Release Act, S.C. 1992, c. 20, s. 27 rights—S. 30, not s. 27, applicable to grievances regarding security classification of inmates—Neither section according offender right to disclosure of information prior to decision on security classification—Contrary to applicant’s submission, corrective action was ordered: Institution Head to ensure future security classification reviews articulated with detailed, justified rationale, so as to afford inmate opportunity to know information considered in making decision—Application dismissed.
Leblanc v. Canada (Attorney General) (T-653-06, 2006 FC 1337, Beaudry J., judgment dated 7/11/06, 22 pp.)