Digests

Decision Information

Decision Content

Kirkbi AG v. Ritvik Holdings Inc.

T-2799-96

Muldoon J.

25/2/98

10 pp.

Preliminary determination of question of law or of admissibility-Motion for determination of admissibility of portions of affidavit evidence, prior to trial, summary judgment proceedings-Plaintiffs engaged in design, manufacture, sale of children's building toys, accessories under trade mark of LEGO-Defendants also engaged in manufacture of children's toys-Main action claim by plaintiffs that defendants unlawfully reproduced LEGO trade mark in advertising, promotional material-Sole issue to determine whether argument of admissibility of evidence should be heard prior to trial-While plaintiffs asked that admissibility of evidence be determined, ultimate result sought to have portions of affidavit removed from affidavit-Same result as motion under R. 419-General purpose of R. 474 to provide determinations which expedite or shorten trial-R. 474(1)(b) to be confined to general questions of admissibility, rather than admissibility of evidence where context of evidence required to be assessed-Motion before Court not pertaining to admissibility of evidence in general sense-Summary judgment judge in best position to hear entire scope of case, can best determine evidence in proper setting-Admissibility of evidence not to be determined in vacuum-Bringing of instant motion permissible, but wasteful of Court's time and resources, inexpedient-Federal Court Rules, C.R.C., c. 663, RR. 419, 474.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.