Digests

Decision Information

Decision Content

Moretto v. Canada ( Attorney General )

A-667-96

Linden J.A.

24/3/98

2 pp.

Application to set aside decision made by Umpire, Board of referees-Umpire, Board did not err in holding applicant was "working a full working week" under Unemployment Insurance Regulations, s. 43-Erred in law in determination of appropriateness of penalty for knowingly making false statement contrary to Unemployment Insurance Act, s. 33-That legally false statement made not necessarily meaning it was made knowing it was false-There must be subjective knowledge of falsity-Board, Umpire assumed making legally false statement led inevitably to finding subjectively known to be so-Wrong in law in not properly considering question of whether claimant subjectively knew statements made false-Application allowed in part-Unemployment Insurance Regulations, C.R.C., c. 1576, s. 43-Unemployment Insurance Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. U-1, s. 33 (as repealed by S.C. 1996, c. 23, s. 155).

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.