Digests

Decision Information

Decision Content

Khaira v. Canada

IMM-6968-93

Teitelbaum J.

3/3/94

2 pp.

Application by applicants for oral hearing of respondent's motion for order dismissing application for judicial review, pursuant to R. 324 -- Respondent not having right of veto on R. 324 motion -- R. 324(1) explicitly providing motion to dispense with oral hearing in discretion of Court or prothonotary if considered expedient: Olson v. Canada, [1993] 1 F.C. 32 (C.A.) -- Respondent to R. 324 application cannot obtain order from Court for oral hearing simply by requesting same -- Party requesting oral hearing must give some valid reasons -- Application denied -- Federal Court Rules, C.R.C., c. 663, R. 324.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.