Portillo v. Canada ( Minister of Employment and Immigration )
IMM-5623-93
Giles A.S.P.
4/1/94
2 pp.
Motion for extension of time to file reply -- Reply served on Department of Justice in Toronto -- Registry of Court refusing to file reply as style of cause incorrect -- Error corrected, but on re-service to Department, admission of service refused -- Reply not filed timeously -- No Court requirement service be admitted -- Where admission of service refused, persons serving paper should hand it to receptionist or knowledgeable person rather than leaving it unattended inside door -- Had explanatory affidavit been filed herein, great deal of inconvenience would have been saved -- Short extension granted.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.